[Dojo-interest] dojo: framework vs library

[Tim Mansfield]

On 5/13/05, Tom Trenka <ttrenka at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, let me amend that as well...I don't think the main point of
> Dojo is to be a framework as much as it is a loosely-bound library
> with which to build applications.

(starting a new topic-specific thread.)

Tom, can you please elaborate on the distinction you're making between
a framework versus a library, wrt Dojo?