[dojo-contributors] DDD Location Vote
Brad Neuberg
bradneuberg at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 19:45:23 UTC 2008
BAY AREA
If you need a place to host it I might be able enquire with my
employer. No promises but I might be able to wing it.
Sent from my cell phone
On Jan 3, 2008, at 4:00 AM, dojo-contributors-request at dojotoolkit.org
wrote:
> Send dojo-contributors mailing list submissions to
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> dojo-contributors-request at dojotoolkit.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> dojo-contributors-owner at dojotoolkit.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of dojo-contributors digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: DDD Location Vote (Karl Tiedt)
> 2. New Year discount on w4tches yDryp (Jody Jordan)
> 3. Re: Allow multiple dojo versions in a page for 1.1? (sam
> foster)
> 4. Re: Allow multiple dojo versions in a page for 1.1?
> (Michael Smith)
> 5. Re: DDD Location Vote (Bill Keese)
> 6. Re: Allow multiple dojo versions in a page for 1.1? (Bill Keese)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:48:05 -0600
> From: "Karl Tiedt" <ktiedt at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dojo-contributors] DDD Location Vote
> To: "dojo dev." <dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org>
> Message-ID:
> <ef496b460801021748v3575ac2dvb5fdbd13825d57b4 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Bay Area
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 7:27 PM, Owen Williams <owen at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
>
>> BAY AREA
>>
>>
>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Dustin Machi wrote:
>>
>>> Please Vote for where you would like the DDD meeting to be held on
>>> Feb 7
>>> and 8.
>>>
>>> reply with PHOENIX or BAY AREA to indicate your preference.
>>> We'll go
>>> with the larger number of votes :)
>>>
>>> Voting will be closed on Friday (1/4) at midnight pdt.
>>>
>>> Dustin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>>> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Karl Tiedt
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20080102/e7e22e7c/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:28:21 -0500
> From: "Jody Jordan" <alex at dojotoolkit.org>
> Subject: [dojo-contributors] New Year discount on w4tches yDryp
> To: alex at dojotoolkit.org
> Cc: rsvp at dojotoolkit.org, dojo-interest-bounces at dojotoolkit.org,
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org,
> dojo-contributors-owner at dojotoolkit.org,
> dojo-interest-owner at dojotoolkit.org, dojo-interest at dojotoolkit.org
> Message-ID: <dywcavyMAZVFalex at dojotoolkit.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>
>
> New Year is knocking, 0rder precious repl1ca w4tches!
> Brand new models of w4tches, purses & bags from 2008!
> http://www.spodiek.com/
>
> cRPShi8jRZPp
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:31:26 -0600
> From: "sam foster" <potatosculptor at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dojo-contributors] Allow multiple dojo versions in a
> page for 1.1?
> To: "dojo dev." <dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org>
> Message-ID:
> <9e3dd260801022331k607eca61x53598177c8936e04 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Just in answer to the question as to whether the gain is worth the
> effort,
> for me at least that's a big yes. Having a backwards and
> future-compatibility plan and mechanism to avoid namespace
> collisions and
> unintended redefinition is a big hairy issue that I need to deal
> with - and
> that I dont really have a satisfactory answer for currently. I dont
> know
> that this will address all of my requirements, but its really
> encouraging to
> see and I hope it gets proper consideration.
> All the platform/library folks that bundle dojo must have the same
> issue -
> I'm thinking of things like Struts2, Tapestry, Catalyst etc., where
> the
> build and bundling has typically happened upstream of the developer.
> My
> worst-case scenario that I stress test all these strategies against
> is a
> portal, where different portlets (perhaps from different vendors) each
> provide their own js library - which might include different
> versions of
> dojo. Granted it would be slow and inefficient, but it should at
> least work.
>
>
> (/me just notices that wednesday - and presumably the meeting -
> already
> happened)
>
> Sam
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 3:22 PM, James Burke <jburke at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 2, 2008 1:02 PM, Shane O'Sullivan <shaneosullivan1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Also, if there is just one installation of Dojo on the page, will it
>>> still be possible to use 'dojo' and not 'dojo10'? If so, then this
>>> seems like a good idea. If not, not.
>>
>> The names will stay the same (dojo, dijit, dojox) by default. They
>> only get new names if you define a djConfig.scopeMap (or you have
>> that
>> scope map burned in as part of an optional build step).
>>
>> James
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20080103/af1d4909/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:01:51 -0800
> From: "Michael Smith" <savoyboy at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dojo-contributors] Allow multiple dojo versions in a
> page for 1.1?
> To: "dojo dev." <dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org>
> Message-ID:
> <4c97b22b0801030001l85d9241x8823c6a070de425 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I would also echo that there seems to be quite a bit of benefit from
> the
> idea, theoretically. I think it offers a very attractive way to
> upgrade a
> complex application to a newer version of Dojo. In an agile
> development
> world, being able to have two versions of dojo in a page allows the
> application to be upgraded in several iterations, each one being
> deliverable. While I also agree that it will be a bit slower and
> inefficient
> to load two versions of Dojo, layering the builds as each area of the
> application is ported to the new version would help.
>
> It's a great idea, James. I hope it works out. And although I won't
> be in
> the Wednesday meeting, you have my vote.
>
> ~Michael Smith
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 11:31 PM, sam foster <potatosculptor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just in answer to the question as to whether the gain is worth the
>> effort,
>> for me at least that's a big yes. Having a backwards and
>> future-compatibility plan and mechanism to avoid namespace
>> collisions and
>> unintended redefinition is a big hairy issue that I need to deal
>> with - and
>> that I dont really have a satisfactory answer for currently. I dont
>> know
>> that this will address all of my requirements, but its really
>> encouraging to
>> see and I hope it gets proper consideration.
>> All the platform/library folks that bundle dojo must have the same
>> issue -
>> I'm thinking of things like Struts2, Tapestry, Catalyst etc., where
>> the
>> build and bundling has typically happened upstream of the
>> developer. My
>> worst-case scenario that I stress test all these strategies against
>> is a
>> portal, where different portlets (perhaps from different vendors)
>> each
>> provide their own js library - which might include different
>> versions of
>> dojo. Granted it would be slow and inefficient, but it should at
>> least work.
>>
>>
>> (/me just notices that wednesday - and presumably the meeting -
>> already
>> happened)
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> On Jan 2, 2008 3:22 PM, James Burke <jburke at dojotoolkit.org > wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 2, 2008 1:02 PM, Shane O'Sullivan <
>>> shaneosullivan1 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Also, if there is just one installation of Dojo on the page, will
>>>> it
>>>> still be possible to use 'dojo' and not 'dojo10'? If so, then this
>>>> seems like a good idea. If not, not.
>>>
>>> The names will stay the same (dojo, dijit, dojox) by default. They
>>> only get new names if you define a djConfig.scopeMap (or you have
>>> that
>>> scope map burned in as part of an optional build step).
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>>
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20080103/54b02db8/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:31:57 +0900
> From: Bill Keese <bill at dojotoolkit.org>
> Subject: Re: [dojo-contributors] DDD Location Vote
> To: "dojo dev." <dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org>
> Message-ID: <477CAB8D.1080506 at dojotoolkit.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> No preference from me (but I thought I'd reply so you didn't think I
> was
> ignoring you :-) )
>
> Dustin Machi wrote:
>> Please Vote for where you would like the DDD meeting to be held on
>> Feb 7
>> and 8.
>>
>> reply with PHOENIX or BAY AREA to indicate your preference. We'll
>> go
>> with the larger number of votes :)
>>
>> Voting will be closed on Friday (1/4) at midnight pdt.
>>
>> Dustin
>> _______________________________________________
>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:49:28 +0900
> From: Bill Keese <bill at dojotoolkit.org>
> Subject: Re: [dojo-contributors] Allow multiple dojo versions in a
> page for 1.1?
> To: "dojo dev." <dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org>
> Message-ID: <477CAFA8.8020508 at dojotoolkit.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> James Burke wrote:
>> I've been working on a change that would allow running more than one
>> version of Dojo in the page:
>> http://trac.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/4573
>
> It sounds good to me. I don't think this change will help dijit,
> because it doesn't resolve CSS naming conflicts, but at least it's a
> start.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>
>
> End of dojo-contributors Digest, Vol 46, Issue 4
> ************************************************
More information about the dojo-contributors
mailing list